Talk:Radioactive Waste: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
The wayneiac (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
What about the "Tree of Life present during 2I" theory? --[[User:Dr. Nick|Dr. Nick]] 12:56, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | What about the "Tree of Life present during 2I" theory? --[[User:Dr. Nick|Dr. Nick]] 12:56, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
:HAHAHAHA. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 13:15, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | :HAHAHAHA. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 13:15, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Yes, "DotS" and ToL at 2I are both good choices. --[[User:The wayneiac|thewayneiac]] Aug. 24, 2007 18:40 EDT. | |||
==Akira== | ==Akira== | ||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
:::ADDENDUM: Since a number of things date back to THEN, an entry would be somewhat useful to provide quick 'n' dirty "historical context". "Revelations Incident" is somewhat more graceful than "when I/Reichu temporarily went off my/her nut". --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 13:15, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | :::ADDENDUM: Since a number of things date back to THEN, an entry would be somewhat useful to provide quick 'n' dirty "historical context". "Revelations Incident" is somewhat more graceful than "when I/Reichu temporarily went off my/her nut". --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 13:15, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
I think I'll let someone else write the "Revelations" entry; it scares me. (Unless absolutely no one else will write it; then I suppose I'll have to.) --[[User:The wayneiac|thewayneiac]] Aug. 24, 2007 18:43 EDT. |
Revision as of 22:47, 24 August 2007
Interesting idea, Wayne... (And, LOL Sarai.) --Reichu 03:00, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
Thanks, I'd thought you'd like this. "The Spear of Longinus = Adam's S2 Engine" would be another possible entry. --thewayneiac Aug. 24, 2007 11:30 EDT.
- If our Failures are going to go here, then shouldn't DotS be moved, as well?
- We should ask Ornette if the Spear=Adam's S2 Engine thread is still around... --Reichu 11:37, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
What about the "Tree of Life present during 2I" theory? --Dr. Nick 12:56, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- HAHAHAHA. --Reichu 13:15, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
Yes, "DotS" and ToL at 2I are both good choices. --thewayneiac Aug. 24, 2007 18:40 EDT.
Akira
"For some reason, even though it's just a pet name, for a brief time certain people began using it in serious posts": Hmm... No providing any "historical context" here, eh? --Reichu 13:15, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
Revelations
If the "Time of Revelations" were to be mentioned explained anywhere, it should be in a place like this. --Reichu 03:00, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- Wouldn't that be a "vanity entry", as I believe Wikipedia calls them? :P Also, wouldn't "genetic waste" fit the theme of Evangelion better? --Dr. Nick 03:40, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- Regarding "vanity entries", I've had to explain what happened that couple of months enough times that I've often wished there was a better way.
- It's not vanity if Reichu doesn't write it. --Reichu 03:49, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- ADDENDUM: Since a number of things date back to THEN, an entry would be somewhat useful to provide quick 'n' dirty "historical context". "Revelations Incident" is somewhat more graceful than "when I/Reichu temporarily went off my/her nut". --Reichu 13:15, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
I think I'll let someone else write the "Revelations" entry; it scares me. (Unless absolutely no one else will write it; then I suppose I'll have to.) --thewayneiac Aug. 24, 2007 18:43 EDT.