Talk:Re-Take: Difference between revisions

From EvaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The article itself is really well written but, does it seem to be slightly informally written or something of that type? Still, for a first timer it's great and needs a bit more work. How do you think Ursus? --Bee-Zerk 20:52, 7 April, 2008 (AEST)
The article itself is really well written but, does it seem to be slightly informally written or something of that type? Still, for a first timer it's great and needs a bit more work. How do you think Ursus? --Bee-Zerk 20:52, 7 April, 2008 (AEST)
I had to correct a load of spelling mistakes, though. And the lines were coming in a rather odd pattern when I tried to edit them. Otherwise, I like it.--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 03:57, 7 April 2008 (PDT)

Revision as of 10:57, 7 April 2008

The article itself is really well written but, does it seem to be slightly informally written or something of that type? Still, for a first timer it's great and needs a bit more work. How do you think Ursus? --Bee-Zerk 20:52, 7 April, 2008 (AEST)

I had to correct a load of spelling mistakes, though. And the lines were coming in a rather odd pattern when I tried to edit them. Otherwise, I like it.--UrsusArctos 03:57, 7 April 2008 (PDT)