Talk:Evangelion shopping in australia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:There never was, and the language needs a ton of cleanup. Of course, I could delete this page and leave it open for "resurrection" like the AWL and Tiffany Grant pages. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 18:38, 6 April 2008 (PDT) | :There never was, and the language needs a ton of cleanup. Of course, I could delete this page and leave it open for "resurrection" like the AWL and Tiffany Grant pages. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 18:38, 6 April 2008 (PDT) | ||
With articles like this, can the "3rd person rule" be excepted because it's a review? But Zeak said you can't really write a review in 3rd person sense but it's actually possible if that the "language" problem, you mean. --Bee-Zerk, 16:03, 7 April 2008 (AEST) |
Revision as of 06:04, 7 April 2008
About "reviews by Zeak"- I'd rather not have a particular member's contribution mentioned on the article page itself. Great work with the rest, though!--UrsusArctos 05:20, 6 April 2008 (PDT)
Is this page necessary? --Zugzwang 08:29, 6 April 2008 (PDT)
Personally, I'm wondering this, myself. Was there a plan of making shopping pages from different parts of the globe? --Sailor Star Dust 11:53, 6 April 2008 (PDT)
- There never was, and the language needs a ton of cleanup. Of course, I could delete this page and leave it open for "resurrection" like the AWL and Tiffany Grant pages. --UrsusArctos 18:38, 6 April 2008 (PDT)
With articles like this, can the "3rd person rule" be excepted because it's a review? But Zeak said you can't really write a review in 3rd person sense but it's actually possible if that the "language" problem, you mean. --Bee-Zerk, 16:03, 7 April 2008 (AEST)