User talk:FelipeFritschF

Hello! Been a fan for many years.

A little something, but since you've been so active in the one week you've been here...I should say the first truly active user in a long, LONG time, I gave you the right to create your own userpage. Hope the permissions still work the way they used to. Thanks for the recent work - I admit it's a pleasant surprise to see someone hard at work on the wiki after such a long dormant period! --UrsusArctos (talk) 02:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! But really, it's thanks to Reichu giving me ideas on the EGF Discord.: FelipeFritschF (talk) 20:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

I saw your little note about Bhorium - they've had userpage rights ever since 2015, but haven't created one. That was very kind of you! --UrsusArctos (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Saw your note and decided to make you a TheoryAdmin because I can't figure out what else might help. By rights, you should already be able to edit the page. That you're not is because something in the wiki code is still horribly messed up, and I'm not sure what that is.

Incidentally, are you on the Evangelion wikia? --UrsusArctos (talk) 01:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Got your message, and feel free to take your time with that page! I'll take a look at it if I'm free. Regarding wikia, there appear to be several pages that they've copied that don't acknowledge us, mostly the older episode pages, although there are many others that do so under the CC-BY-SA guidelines. I thought that adding the templates on those pages and granting our wiki credit where credit is due might be a good thing prior to 3.0 + 1.0, because I was under the impression that our wiki was losing pageviews to the wikia one. If that's not the case, perhaps it doesn't actually matter. Since I never signed up for the Evangelion wikia, I'm in a poor position to compare its popularity with our wiki. --UrsusArctos (talk) 01:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for not replying in a while, I'm here fairly erratically these days. To answer your question, there are episode pages, such as this one for example - https://evangelion.fandom.com/wiki/Episode:24 - that blatantly use Evawiki material without attribution and pretty much rip off everything including the notes and trivia. While I do see that some episode pages such as their episode 16 page have attribution, most of them don't. --UrsusArctos (talk) 05:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Admin and Bureaucrat permissions

Hi Felipe, I've decided to give you Admin and Bureaucrat permissions for the wiki since you've been on recently and seem to be at work on several things, and I think you might need these to clear up the mess that our wiki is in presently. I hope you find these useful, and I'm glad you're continuing to be at work while most of us are away --UrsusArctos (talk) 21:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Reference List

No need to add that to pages that don't have references. It's pointless on the Warships page, for instance, because I haven't added that sort of referencing to the page. --UrsusArctos (talk) 06:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Never mind, I'm an idiot. I forgot I added that! Don't know what I was thinking at the time, it's probably better off without it. --UrsusArctos (talk) 06:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Adding interviews and videos

If I add an interview, it stays on the wiki and you are not the one to judge whether it is to stay or not. Material from other sites will be made available here. And the Annocinema youtube videos go into their own article on video interviews if you wish to add them. --UrsusArctos (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Image Fixes

I completely forgot about fixing the image links in the Shinji Ikari article. Thank you so much for your hard work! --UrsusArctos (talk) 12:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Spoiler Characters

Felipe, please don't make extra pages for the Shin Eva characters just yet, those are open spoilers! Please put the Shin Eva characters in the Rebuild minor characters spoiler section. That way, anyone who wants to read the wiki without being spoiled can do so in peace. --UrsusArctos (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry. I'll also put in the spoiler tags for the Shikinami and Kensuke articles. I'm just getting around to Mari.FelipeFritschF (talk) 21:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, that's good. Please keep putting those spoiler tags wherever you're adding 3.0 + 1.0 information! --UrsusArctos (talk) 21:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

I've moved the spoiler sections for both Mari's article and Hikari's down to the bottom of the page. Tell me if this works at keeping the spoilers out of sight for those seeking for them, or if those should be moved back to their regular place. It occurs to me that Mari's spoiler section, in particular, was in the middle of a lot of other data about her character. --UrsusArctos (talk) 16:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

If it works, could you do the same for Kensuke and Asuka Shinkinami's articles? Thanks! --UrsusArctos (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I actually think it has the reverse effect. The spoiler tag is big enough to make people who wish to avoid it turn their eyes away. When you put the page down below, anyone that just scrolls to to the bottom on instinct is bound to end up reading it, accidentally or not. What's at the beginning and at the end of any given text is what usually gets the most attention. However, I think you have the right idea with separating it into a subsection to make it clearer, so I'll do a hybrid approach: I'll put it in the middle, with tags, but also separate it with a subsection. It creates a buffer zone of sorts. I'm kinda unsure how to go about some character articles, mostly Rei and Shinji as those are rather beefy (naturally). Even worse though is the fact that they haven't received much focus on camrips or discussion so we can't be too sure. I think I'll end up making a relatively short description and significantly expand it with time.FelipeFritschF (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I will be bringing that up with the other guys to see what works (been juggling too much already), so please keep in mind that you might have to reverse that. --UrsusArctos (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

No Asushin shipping on the wiki

Incidentally, I've had to admin-protect the Asuka, Shinji and Shin Eva article on the wiki because you took far too much of a liberty with the Asuka-Shinji meeting and beach scene and interpreted it from the Asuka-Shinji shipping point of view. Keep shipping off the wiki! --UrsusArctos (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Yo, okay, but I think you're being too dismissive too, if anything I think she is using the bento to put it into context instead of it being the sole reason, so I'd rather not mention that. I do think Asuka should be mentioned to be blushing though, it's pretty significant. I assume the Khara sub will end up using "love", but I understand the wording goes either way. Perhaps you might want to make it "liked/loved", but I think repeating "past tense" is excessive. Like, the point isn't that she doesn't care about him anymore, but rather that she got over it, and had to, for the obvious reasons.

Still need to work on the other characters anyway, but not sure when I'll get around to themFelipeFritschF (talk) 19:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

If nothing, I believe I'm not being dismissive enough of the idea. Stop going on about it ad nauseam, I've already seen you go about it on Discord and on the forum. Drop it, for heaven's sake! --UrsusArctos (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Only the lack of independent confirmation of your sources is preventing me from completely reverting all your edits, because your obsession with Asushin shipping has reached the point where I can't trust you to keep any kind of neutrality about it. --UrsusArctos (talk) 14:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Canon Page

Those are good additions to the "What is Canon?" page, and although we'll all probably have to sit down and review those additions - and decide if we want to keep it as it is or restructure it - let me tell you that you've done some really good work in bringing all these matters up for future reference, and updating it. I'll be blunt in saying that I don't appreciate shipping on the wiki, but let me be equally honest in saying that you've done a great many necessary things. No matter how mad I may be at you at times, I genuine appreciate all the good you've done for us. --UrsusArctos (talk) 11:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

NO ADV stuff, NO removing templates

Do I make myself clear? If I put a template, you are not removing it. I will continue to revert/delete your edits as necessary to enforce some sense on the wiki, because you do not listen to reason. --UrsusArctos (talk) 04:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

The whole reason we made the article - you can ask Reichu if you want as this is yet another article that was discussed with people in 2019 - was to address the supposed "originality" and "faithfulness" of the ADV script and how actually Netflix butchered the show, or so the narrative went. It's about ADV, so I don't understand why you'd want to remove the now much reduced mention to AWL, with Kanemitsu's response to correct it. Her claims spread like wildfire, but Kanemitsu's correction didn't. Shouldn't it be noted here? I have made tons of edits addressing the problems ADV introduced to analyzing the show in different articles, so I am of course well aware of when to quote them or not.FelipeFritschF (talk) 04:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

You have consistently spouted completely wrong information about your working relationship with Reichu, which is why I seriously question your intent here. If it turns out that you're giving me false information about your work with Reichu again, I'll have no option but to punish you for it. --UrsusArctos (talk) 04:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Furthermore, we are conducting this discussion on YOUR userpage, don't add information on my userpage. That creates two discussions, when I want this to be just ONE. --UrsusArctos (talk) 04:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

This is all on EGFD. That article in particular involved a good 5+ people at the time, besides research. I can send you the DMs if you want. And I'm not sure where exactly I spouted "wrong information", as I have pointed out to evidence in the past. Just like I mentioned a conversation I pinged you in last week and you said I didn't link to it and thus it was my fault. It's like you're ignoring me except when it comes to criticize me. FelipeFritschF (talk) 04:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

It was absolutely your fault that you didn't ping me in that conversation. You deserve all the criticism you get, and Reichu has specifically called you out on your claims of having a good working relationship with her, among other things. How do I really trust you if your judgement is so warped? --UrsusArctos (talk) 04:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

I think you are taking me saying "I discussed X with Reichu at the time", which I can and have proven for "good working relationship" which is a qualifier I didn't make. I just said I discussed this with her (and other people) when the articles were being made. There was a lot of stuff being done in mid-2019 and I don't remember if you were even in the server yet. That's all. FelipeFritschF (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

You said as much in a different context, and I had to ask Reichu about it. Reichu has also been generally very unhappy about your behavior and interactions with her, so if you invoke Reichu in the creation of any article I treat it as suspect. Also, don't talk about stuff being done in mid-2019, it was mostly you going completely off on your own and I have been on the wiki since right after its inception. Don't try talking me down about this, or questioning my judgment or that of the other wiki admins. That's all I have to say. --UrsusArctos (talk) 05:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Then please present to me what that context is, because I have never intended to make such a claim and I don't know why you'd get that impression in the first place. It was not just me either. Everything here and in the other articles was extensively discussed at the time, but on EGFD, not here. FelipeFritschF (talk) 05:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

The context is a private discord conversation with Reichu in which I have presented the claim made by you on Discord, and I have her criticism of you on record. --UrsusArctos (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Like I said, I pointed out when I discussed specific stuff with her or other people. I also sent images of those specific cases at those instances. Not that I'm buddies with anyone. That's all. FelipeFritschF (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)