User talk:Nuclear Lunchbox
Profile
For some reason, Evageeks isn't letting me create a User page. This annoys me.
- The user page is a feature that need to be granted per user. It was disabled because the majority of people who wanted wiki access did nothing else but treat their userpage as an extension to their facebook profile. I'll turn on access when I'm a bit more sober if someone else hasn't already done so. --Ornette (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2013 (PDT)
- That makes sense, I suppose. Thanks for the explanation, and I look forward to creating my User Page as soon as the feature is unlocked. --Nuclear Lunchbox (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2013 (PDT)
Problems with Nuke
You've got questions or problems? Slap 'em here, unless I already have a rant on the subject. In that case, go speak there.
Nuke, please put images you upload into the proper subcategory. So, for example, 3.0 screenshots would be [[Category:Images (Eva 3.0 Screenshots)]]. --Reichu (talk) 17:18, 14 May 2013 (PDT)
- I'll be sure to address this in the future. Thank you for the specific link. Nuclear Lunchbox (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2013 (PDT)
Hayfaps and PhysBoobics don't belong here
Nuke, I'm nuking those sections from your personal page, because it's the kind of sexist nonsense none of us ever want to see on the wiki. It's a different matter if you put that on your own blog or website, but it really doesn't belong here, on this site. --UrsusArctos (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2013 (EST)
- The intention was not to be sexist in the least. Both pieces were utterly satirical and not meant to be taken seriously. If I squint at it, I guess I can see how the whole PhysBoobics thing could be sexist, but the Hayfap? I really don't see how it's sexist. The "monster girls" line was even borrowed from Xard's sig. I'm not going to ask you to repeal your decision, but I will openly express my displeasure here. Nuclear Lunchbox (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2013 (EST)
- Well, this is the second time recently that your sense of "satire" has come out all wrong - case in point being the utterly inappropriate avatar on the forum (that's a separate offense and will be treated separately but I don't like your lack of judgment). And while we do give you a userpage on the wiki, it's not meant to be your blog for perverted material. We're responsible for what goes on here, and we don't want anyone putting up material we're not willing to take responsibility for. Just start your own blog if you so desperately want to put something like this up, how hard is that? --UrsusArctos (talk) 22:22, 3 December 2013 (EST)
- The intention was not to be sexist in the least. Both pieces were utterly satirical and not meant to be taken seriously. If I squint at it, I guess I can see how the whole PhysBoobics thing could be sexist, but the Hayfap? I really don't see how it's sexist. The "monster girls" line was even borrowed from Xard's sig. I'm not going to ask you to repeal your decision, but I will openly express my displeasure here. Nuclear Lunchbox (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2013 (EST)
