Talk:Evangelion Unit-03: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Bardiel is officially compared to a "fungus", as well, not "mucus". I can provide a citation for this later. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 22:41, 12 April 2009 (PDT) | Bardiel is officially compared to a "fungus", as well, not "mucus". I can provide a citation for this later. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 22:41, 12 April 2009 (PDT) | ||
:I saw the scene in question. You're right, the growth does appear during the activation test. I suppose I'll let the Eva stay as a "she"...and no, we didn't officially rescind the policy of calling an Eva "she", but I think we changed it to something like "and Eva can be called a she or an it, but don't alternate between two in the same article or part of the article." Thanks for reminding me of that. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 00:21, 13 April 2009 (PDT) |
Revision as of 07:21, 13 April 2009
I propose putting all the soul speculation on one page. The page "Soul of Eva-00" could be made "Evangelion Resident Souls". That way, we could have speculation on Eva-00 as well as Eva-03 and other Evas (harpies, for instance) so clutter like that on this page could be avoided. --UrsusArctos 08:15, 21 March 2009 (PDT)
- The Eva-00 soul issue is big and specific enough to deserve its own page. This is a more "general" thing, IMO, plus it involves the whole "mothers and children who've lost their mothers" thing where Rei and Eva-00 do not. --Reichu 22:11, 23 March 2009 (PDT)
Ursus, I see you modifying "she"s to "it"s. Was that policy ever officially changed, though...? If you did it because "Bardiel =/= Eva-03", well, Bardi IS using her body, and this is Eva-03's article, so, for simplicity's sake...
Bardiel is officially compared to a "fungus", as well, not "mucus". I can provide a citation for this later. --Reichu 22:41, 12 April 2009 (PDT)
- I saw the scene in question. You're right, the growth does appear during the activation test. I suppose I'll let the Eva stay as a "she"...and no, we didn't officially rescind the policy of calling an Eva "she", but I think we changed it to something like "and Eva can be called a she or an it, but don't alternate between two in the same article or part of the article." Thanks for reminding me of that. --UrsusArctos 00:21, 13 April 2009 (PDT)