Talk:A Cruel Angel's Thesis: Difference between revisions

From EvaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 9: Line 9:


::::Yeah, that's fine. Let me clarify what I meant though: Oikawa was orientated by the producer that it was "serious and difficult", and upon reading it, the "it's about older women, mothers, and 14 year old boys" was her conclusion. I thought this further illustrates how much she didn't know what the show was about herself and only made a guess. If you think it's too off there it can be relegated to being inside the reference, I suppose.[[User:FelipeFritschF|FelipeFritschF]] ([[User talk:FelipeFritschF|talk]])
::::Yeah, that's fine. Let me clarify what I meant though: Oikawa was orientated by the producer that it was "serious and difficult", and upon reading it, the "it's about older women, mothers, and 14 year old boys" was her conclusion. I thought this further illustrates how much she didn't know what the show was about herself and only made a guess. If you think it's too off there it can be relegated to being inside the reference, I suppose.[[User:FelipeFritschF|FelipeFritschF]] ([[User talk:FelipeFritschF|talk]])
:::::I don't think any further illustrations are necessary at this point, and Oikawa may have been talking about the human characters she paid attention to. There's no need to over-elaborate on details here, we already have covered the point that Oikawa watched only the bare minimum of the show. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] ([[User talk:UrsusArctos|talk]]) 13:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:04, 6 February 2021

I'm not convinced about the validity of those translations just yet, and some of that stuff seems more like sensationalist nonsense not worth putting up here. --UrsusArctos (talk) 03:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, would you like to ask for someone else to verify the translation? But why is it sensationalist? It's just the lyricist herself explaining the details. It matches what we knew already from he SoraNews article from 2015, which is still left included, and expands it further. FelipeFritschF (talk)
Please do that, because the parts about "orientated towards older women" make very little sense to me. I'm going to reintroduce some of what you've written, but with less of those details because I found some of the quotes distracting and confusing. --UrsusArctos (talk) 03:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Here. I haven't left out any of the things that matter with what you've done, the quote sourcing is interesting but I think Oikawa is exaggerating a little --UrsusArctos (talk) 03:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


Yeah, that's fine. Let me clarify what I meant though: Oikawa was orientated by the producer that it was "serious and difficult", and upon reading it, the "it's about older women, mothers, and 14 year old boys" was her conclusion. I thought this further illustrates how much she didn't know what the show was about herself and only made a guess. If you think it's too off there it can be relegated to being inside the reference, I suppose.FelipeFritschF (talk)
I don't think any further illustrations are necessary at this point, and Oikawa may have been talking about the human characters she paid attention to. There's no need to over-elaborate on details here, we already have covered the point that Oikawa watched only the bare minimum of the show. --UrsusArctos (talk) 13:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)