User talk:DanYeomans: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::That template looks perfect now! --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] ([[User talk:UrsusArctos|talk]]) 19:59, 29 January 2014 (EST) | ::That template looks perfect now! --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] ([[User talk:UrsusArctos|talk]]) 19:59, 29 January 2014 (EST) | ||
=== Timeline === | |||
Hey, I noticed that you put together a pretty detailed timeline, is that related to the other timeline page that we have? [[Neon Genesis Evangelion timeline]] --[[User:Ornette|Ornette]] ([[User talk:Ornette|talk]]) 23:59, 18 March 2014 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:59, 19 March 2014
Could you put bold instead of italics in those templates? The italicized text doesn't stand out enough, if you ask me. --UrsusArctos (talk) 18:20, 27 January 2014 (EST)
Yeah sure, I just thought the italics looked a bit more professional, but will do --Yeomans (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2014 (EST)
- Definitely better-looking. By the way, I think the spgerror template needs to return to "EMARGENCY". That's not Kaji's horrendously butchered English from 2.0, but a major spelling error in the original series that's being referenced and even shown in the image. The "lealm of possibirity" thing is funny but it is sort of generic.--UrsusArctos (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2014 (EST)
- EDIT - turns out we don't have that "emargency" image after all. If you're keeping the Kaji thing, how about a shot of the Bethany Base commander's "what is he saying?" expression? That one's hilarious. --UrsusArctos (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2014 (EST)
- That template looks perfect now! --UrsusArctos (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2014 (EST)
Timeline
Hey, I noticed that you put together a pretty detailed timeline, is that related to the other timeline page that we have? Neon Genesis Evangelion timeline --Ornette (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2014 (EDT)
