User talk:DanYeomans

Could you put bold instead of italics in those templates? The italicized text doesn't stand out enough, if you ask me. --UrsusArctos (talk) 18:20, 27 January 2014 (EST)

Yeah sure, I just thought the italics looked a bit more professional, but will do --Yeomans (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2014 (EST)

Definitely better-looking. By the way, I think the spgerror template needs to return to "EMARGENCY". That's not Kaji's horrendously butchered English from 2.0, but a major spelling error in the original series that's being referenced and even shown in the image. The "lealm of possibirity" thing is funny but it is sort of generic.--UrsusArctos (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2014 (EST)

EDIT - turns out we don't have that "emargency" image after all. If you're keeping the Kaji thing, how about a shot of the Bethany Base commander's "what is he saying?" expression? That one's hilarious. --UrsusArctos (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2014 (EST)

That template looks perfect now! --UrsusArctos (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2014 (EST)

Timeline

Hey, I noticed that you put together a pretty detailed timeline, is that related to the other timeline page that we have? Neon Genesis Evangelion timeline --Ornette (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2014 (EDT)

Yeah, as of right now it's pretty much the same timeline. However, I'm going to expand it with respect to the different continuities (rebuild / manga), and hopefully I'll be able to provide more accurate information given a little research. That's why I've listed it as under construction for the time being. --Yeomans (talk) 11:17, 19 March 2014 (EDT)

Ah, that's cool, maybe the old page can just redirect to the newer one at some point.

That's the plan! ...It'll be quite an undertaking though, so I'm going to have to wait 'till I have time off from school to actually dive into it. It's funny, because I made the under construction template explicitly for that purpose, which inspired me to revise all of the current templates. So the page has actually already spurred some productivity on my part... but I digress. --Yeomans (talk) 12:10, 20 March 2014 (EDT)