User talk:DanYeomans: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DanYeomans (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yeah sure, I just thought the italics looked a bit more professional, but will do --[[User:DanYeomans|Yeomans]] ([[User talk:DanYeomans|talk]]) 21:52, 27 January 2014 (EST) | Yeah sure, I just thought the italics looked a bit more professional, but will do --[[User:DanYeomans|Yeomans]] ([[User talk:DanYeomans|talk]]) 21:52, 27 January 2014 (EST) | ||
:Definitely better-looking. By the way, I think the spgerror template needs to return to "EMARGENCY". That's not Kaji's horrendously butchered English from 2.0, but a major spelling error in the original series that's being referenced and even shown in the image. The "lealm of possibirity" thing is funny but it is sort of generic.--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] ([[User talk:UrsusArctos|talk]]) 22:49, 28 January 2014 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 03:49, 29 January 2014
Could you put bold instead of italics in those templates? The italicized text doesn't stand out enough, if you ask me. --UrsusArctos (talk) 18:20, 27 January 2014 (EST)
Yeah sure, I just thought the italics looked a bit more professional, but will do --Yeomans (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2014 (EST)
- Definitely better-looking. By the way, I think the spgerror template needs to return to "EMARGENCY". That's not Kaji's horrendously butchered English from 2.0, but a major spelling error in the original series that's being referenced and even shown in the image. The "lealm of possibirity" thing is funny but it is sort of generic.--UrsusArctos (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2014 (EST)
