EvaWiki talk:Boot Camp for Newbies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Templates: Deleted an old request of mine.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think it would be a good idea to split this page in two: one for the more philosophical stuff (how to approach writing and editing for the wiki, and so forth), and another for technical MediaWiki shit. In so doing, all remaining V rhetoric can be purged as well. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 20:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
===Name=== | |||
"''I have to go through this removing reference to "EvaWiki" and using..."Evapedia"? Reichu please help; what was your decision?''": Well, that depends. How does "Evapedia" sound to you? --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 12:26, 19 August 2007 (EDT) | "''I have to go through this removing reference to "EvaWiki" and using..."Evapedia"? Reichu please help; what was your decision?''": Well, that depends. How does "Evapedia" sound to you? --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 12:26, 19 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Can't we just leave it alone for now until we decide? We still have the naming thread going. Evapedia sounds good to me, but I'd really prefer something that had to do with "Fan-Geeks"... Just ask on the existing thread if Evapedia is fine with everyone. I don't think many will object. --[[User:Eva Yojimbo|Eva Yojimbo]] 12:31, 19 August 2007 (EDT) | :Can't we just leave it alone for now until we decide? We still have the naming thread going. Evapedia sounds good to me, but I'd really prefer something that had to do with "Fan-Geeks"... Just ask on the existing thread if Evapedia is fine with everyone. I don't think many will object. --[[User:Eva Yojimbo|Eva Yojimbo]] 12:31, 19 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
<I>Do not be scared of the Mediawiki-format of this site. We'd rather have an Evangelion fan with no knowledge of <b>have to use a wiki</b>, than someone who knows everything about how to run a wiki, but knows nothing about Evangelion</i> Shouldn't this be 'HOW to use a wiki'? And should this end with a period, or was the lack of one intentional? Pretty minor, but the first one's pretty distracting, especially when this page is intended for newbies like myself. -MugwumpHasNoLiver | ===Typos=== | ||
<I>Do not be scared of the Mediawiki-format of this site. We'd rather have an Evangelion fan with no knowledge of <b>have to use a wiki</b>, than someone who knows everything about how to run a wiki, but knows nothing about Evangelion</i> Shouldn't this be 'HOW to use a wiki'? And should this end with a period, or was the lack of one intentional? Pretty minor, but the first one's pretty distracting, especially when this page is intended for newbies like myself. --[[User:MugwumpHasNoLiver|MugwumpHasNoLiver]] 22:19 06 August 2009 | |||
:yes --[[User:Ornette|Ornette]] 18:25, 8 August 2009 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 18 March 2014
I think it would be a good idea to split this page in two: one for the more philosophical stuff (how to approach writing and editing for the wiki, and so forth), and another for technical MediaWiki shit. In so doing, all remaining V rhetoric can be purged as well. --Reichu 20:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Name
"I have to go through this removing reference to "EvaWiki" and using..."Evapedia"? Reichu please help; what was your decision?": Well, that depends. How does "Evapedia" sound to you? --Reichu 12:26, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
- Can't we just leave it alone for now until we decide? We still have the naming thread going. Evapedia sounds good to me, but I'd really prefer something that had to do with "Fan-Geeks"... Just ask on the existing thread if Evapedia is fine with everyone. I don't think many will object. --Eva Yojimbo 12:31, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
Typos
Do not be scared of the Mediawiki-format of this site. We'd rather have an Evangelion fan with no knowledge of have to use a wiki, than someone who knows everything about how to run a wiki, but knows nothing about Evangelion Shouldn't this be 'HOW to use a wiki'? And should this end with a period, or was the lack of one intentional? Pretty minor, but the first one's pretty distracting, especially when this page is intended for newbies like myself. --MugwumpHasNoLiver 22:19 06 August 2009
- yes --Ornette 18:25, 8 August 2009 (PDT)
