Theory and Analysis Talk:Ritsuko's Interrogation

I look forward to this; can you give me a link to the original theory thread?--V 19:03, 28 February 2008 (PST)

Yes: [1]

He starts by reviewing everything we know about Ritsuko's personality, so it takes a little while to get to the actual evidence. For some background on what set him on the path to these conclusions, you should also see his thread on Gendo's silent words, where he suggests that Gendo was likely denying complicity in the interrogation. (An idea of mine that I never acted upon.) He links to this thread on the first page of the interrogation thread. -- thewayneiac 19:56 EST. Feb. 29, 2008

Started at last

Thank you, Deepak, for starting this very important page; it should have been done long ago. It's going to take quite a bit of cleanup, of course, to meet the Wiki standards. I've got a start on it. It needs to be re-written to remove the informal tone and first person references of the forum thread. thewayneiac 9:05 PM EDT. Aug. 24, 2011

Did anybody finish the analysis to include when Ritsuko took Shinji down to see the Rei clones. Some people have done parts in that thread but is there a definitive one? Deepak 8:29 AM EDT. Aug. 27, 2011

Shin-seiki left it unfinished and after a long while moved on to the "Gendo's Silent Words" thread instead. We'll probably have to wing it, as it's difficult to get him motivated. If he won't finish it himself, I can at least ask him what he had in mind. thewayneiac 11:49 AM EDT. Aug. 27, 2011

O.K., I've done most of the re-writing on what's already here. I'm going to start bugging Shin-seiki to look it over and make suggestions on how to end it. I'll also have to add the opposition case, or two or three people will raise bloody hell on the forum. thewayneiac 4:59 PM EDT. aug. 30, 2011

"Like you did that time"

I just reverted an edit by someguy. IMO it's much more likely that she's refering to her abuse by Seele than some unrelated occasion where Gendo abused her. Also, that possibility is part of the opposition argument; I'm going to address it when I do that section of the article. [[User:The wayneiac|thewayneiac| 12:12 PM EDT. Sept. 01, 2011

"Like you did that time." This line is said to Gendo, which means he is the one who had his way with her. Do you think Gendo is the nameless Seele agent who raped her before the interrogation? I don't think there is even any room for interpretation that Gendo is the one who had his way with her; this the definition of the word "you." Someguy 02:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I can't agree. There's no context for her to bring up an unrelated incident here. There's no prior indication that their relationship is anything but consensual. Instead, it's been implied that she's wanted Gendo since high school. She's saying that she holds Gendo responsible for her abuse by Seele because he either knew or should have known what they would do. In her mind he is effectively her abuser. In my view it violates Occam to assume she is refering to some other abusive episode we don't know about rather than the one we already do know about. It also makes more sense from a story telling point of view for her to be refering to an incident we already know about.

Of course, your interpretation is far from out of the question, it's always stated in the counter-argument and I always intended to include it. It just seems the less likely interpretation.

Anyway, a Wiki is a collaborative effort; there's a place for both interpretations. The readers can decide which is valid. --thewayeiac 11:56 A.M. EDT. Sept 02, 2011

This is not a matter of interpretation. You have somehow fundementally misunderstood the context and subject of the sentence. She is speaking to Gendo, in response to a question he asked her. There is no one else in the room. She says "Because I'm no longer happy, even when you make love to me. Why don't you just do whatever you want to my body!? Like you did that time!" You are effectively stating Gendo raped her for Seele's benefit, because it is wrong to conclude "you" is not Gendo. What exactly "whatever you want" is open to interpretation, but the subject is not.

There's no prior indication their relationship is anything. This is the first scene that explicitly states they have a sexual relationship. If she is following in her mother's footsteps, she is almost using herself, forcing herself upon Gendo who passively accepts the relationship but does not share the same feelings. We do not "know" a rape has occured any more than we know Gendo abused her at some point (other than her explicitly stating that he did in this scene). Citing Occam's Razor in this circumstance is completely wrong; you are choosing to ignore the meaning of the word "you" for a considerably more convoluted explanation.

I don't particularly care if you personally choose to "interpret" the sentence in this manner, but to present it as solid evidence which could confuse readers who do not remember the scene is a mistake. It's good to have the counterpoint, but there shouldn't need to be a counterpoint, because this shouldn't be mentioned, because it's wrong. There are other points which arguably support she was raped; you should not bring a false point into the mix. Someguy 19:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)