Talk:Neon Genesis Evangelion 2: Difference between revisions

From EvaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
==Article Needs Help==
==Article Needs Help==


General information on the two games should be used to start the article off. As things are, there's just this skeletal blurb of basic info at the top about the PS2 game, and some stuff on Another Cases stranded in "Notes". ''Dame! Dame da!!'' (An infobox for video games might not be a bad idea at some point...) --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 22:29, 12 April 2009 (PDT)
General information on the two games should be used to start the article off. As things are, there's just this skeletal blurb of basic info at the top about the PS2 game, and some stuff on Another Cases stranded in "Notes". ''Dame! Dame da!!''  
 
Also, the info on manga similarities should just be normal writeup under its own heading. There's enough of it.
 
Also also, what little under the F-Type Equipment that isn't non-NPOV Geektionary-type quipping should just get moved to F-Type's skeletal entry on the [[Evangelion equipment]] page.
 
An infobox for video games might not be a bad idea at some point, too... --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 22:29, 12 April 2009 (PDT)

Revision as of 05:34, 13 April 2009

Fixed the title of the Japanese and English names in the article, since I own the game now. ^_^ --Sailor Star Dust 23:46, 15 December 2007 (PST)

Article Needs Help

General information on the two games should be used to start the article off. As things are, there's just this skeletal blurb of basic info at the top about the PS2 game, and some stuff on Another Cases stranded in "Notes". Dame! Dame da!!

Also, the info on manga similarities should just be normal writeup under its own heading. There's enough of it.

Also also, what little under the F-Type Equipment that isn't non-NPOV Geektionary-type quipping should just get moved to F-Type's skeletal entry on the Evangelion equipment page.

An infobox for video games might not be a bad idea at some point, too... --Reichu 22:29, 12 April 2009 (PDT)