Talk:Gainax: Evangelion References and Cross References: Difference between revisions

From EvaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Kill la Kill: - Trigger is no longer part of Gainax, so does it classify strictly as a Gainax reference? That's why I placed it in the other category..)
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Actually, yeah, I guess since it's not technically GAINAX anymore, it could go back to the other category. Anyone else have any thoughts? --[[User:Ornette|Ornette]] ([[User talk:Ornette|talk]]) 17:44, 13 January 2014 (EST)
Actually, yeah, I guess since it's not technically GAINAX anymore, it could go back to the other category. Anyone else have any thoughts? --[[User:Ornette|Ornette]] ([[User talk:Ornette|talk]]) 17:44, 13 January 2014 (EST)
:While it's undecided, I put it in the category "Works by Gainax alumni". That category might get a little problematic if former Gainax employees in other major studios (Sunrise, IG, etc.) insert Evangelion references into their works on their own accord. (Big "if" because I'm not that familiar with how the Japanese animation industry goes about this.) --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] ([[User talk:UrsusArctos|talk]]) 01:02, 14 January 2014 (EST)

Revision as of 06:02, 14 January 2014

"Kill la Kill: - Trigger is no longer part of Gainax, so does it classify strictly as a Gainax reference? That's why I placed it in the other category.."

Actually, yeah, I guess since it's not technically GAINAX anymore, it could go back to the other category. Anyone else have any thoughts? --Ornette (talk) 17:44, 13 January 2014 (EST)

While it's undecided, I put it in the category "Works by Gainax alumni". That category might get a little problematic if former Gainax employees in other major studios (Sunrise, IG, etc.) insert Evangelion references into their works on their own accord. (Big "if" because I'm not that familiar with how the Japanese animation industry goes about this.) --UrsusArctos (talk) 01:02, 14 January 2014 (EST)