Talk:Episode 06: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Animation blunders== | ==Animation blunders== | ||
Does this belong in a sub-topic of its own? Episode 06 suffers badly from a number of blatant visual mistakes, including some pretty obvious ones like the image of Ramiel's beam coming out of the skyscraper being shot through instead of out of his body, the drill that turns backwards, Misato looking awful, the A.T. Field being hexagons instead of octagons, and so on. And who has the credits for the third-string Korean animation team?--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 01:42, 15 November 2007 (PST) | Does this belong in a sub-topic of its own? Episode 06 suffers badly from a number of blatant visual mistakes, including some pretty obvious ones like the image of Ramiel's beam coming out of the skyscraper being shot through instead of out of his body, the drill that turns backwards, Misato looking awful, the A.T. Field being hexagons instead of octagons, and so on. And who has the credits for the third-string Korean animation team?--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 01:42, 15 November 2007 (PST) | ||
Token article on the animation problems in place, feel free to get rid of it if it's unnecessary. | |||
--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 02:43, 15 November 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 10:43, 15 November 2007
Animation blunders
Does this belong in a sub-topic of its own? Episode 06 suffers badly from a number of blatant visual mistakes, including some pretty obvious ones like the image of Ramiel's beam coming out of the skyscraper being shot through instead of out of his body, the drill that turns backwards, Misato looking awful, the A.T. Field being hexagons instead of octagons, and so on. And who has the credits for the third-string Korean animation team?--UrsusArctos 01:42, 15 November 2007 (PST)
Token article on the animation problems in place, feel free to get rid of it if it's unnecessary. --UrsusArctos 02:43, 15 November 2007 (PST)
