FGC Talk:Episode 01 Cut 191: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the commentary is intended to be the ultimate frame by frame guide literally "For Posterity" (future generations), someone may want to note that the hand visible behind them belongs to Eva-01, not Eva-00. It's just a wacky shot (yes, it doesn't make sense that they're that close but then need a boat to get to it, but this is a TV show, and its clearly not really Eva-00). --[[User:V|V]] 23:11, 23 January 2008 (PST) | If the commentary is intended to be the ultimate frame by frame guide literally "For Posterity" (future generations), someone may want to note that the hand visible behind them belongs to Eva-01, not Eva-00. It's just a wacky shot (yes, it doesn't make sense that they're that close but then need a boat to get to it, but this is a TV show, and its clearly not really Eva-00). --[[User:V|V]] 23:11, 23 January 2008 (PST) | ||
:Don't be ridiculous. That can't be Eva-01. And how can you say it's clearly not Eva-00 when it's partially occluded? --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 23:57, 23 January 2008 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 07:57, 24 January 2008
If the commentary is intended to be the ultimate frame by frame guide literally "For Posterity" (future generations), someone may want to note that the hand visible behind them belongs to Eva-01, not Eva-00. It's just a wacky shot (yes, it doesn't make sense that they're that close but then need a boat to get to it, but this is a TV show, and its clearly not really Eva-00). --V 23:11, 23 January 2008 (PST)
- Don't be ridiculous. That can't be Eva-01. And how can you say it's clearly not Eva-00 when it's partially occluded? --UrsusArctos 23:57, 23 January 2008 (PST)
