FGC:Episode 08 Cut 270: Difference between revisions

From EvaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Ornette's bot uploaded this)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{FGC:Scene
{{FGC:Scene
|cuts=
|cuts=
</noinclude>{{FGC:Cut|episode=
</noinclude>{{FGC:Cut|episode=08
|cutname=
|cutname=270
|images=
|images=
[[Image:08_C270a.jpg]]<br><br>
[[Image:08_C270a.jpg]]
 
[[Image:08_C270b.jpg]]
[[Image:08_C270b.jpg]]


Line 11: Line 12:
|script=
|script=


{{FGC:Script Text|type=music
{{FGC:Script Text}}
|text=}}


{{FGC:Script Text|type=description
{{FGC:Script Text|type=description
|text= }}
|text=The two ships sinking downwards!!{{br}}The cable is in between them.}}


{{FGC:Script Text|type=dialogue|speaker=
{{FGC:Script Text|type=regsupplemental|speaker=SPEAKER (FEMALE) (OFF)
|text=}}
|text=The battleships are sinking towards the target.}}


{{FGC:Script Text|type=regsupplemental|speaker=WOMAN (OFF)
|comments=
|text=Both battleships are sinking
towards the target.}}


{{FGC:Script Text|type=regsupplemental|speaker=
{{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos
|text=}}
|comment=Battleships are not hydrodynamic underwater. Real-life battleships that sunk would disintegrate, turning over so that their gun turrets popped out, their superstructure came apart, and their bulkheads imploded from collapsing air pockets. But I can forgive ''Evangelion'' for not paying attention to any of that if the results are cool enough.}}
 
{{FGC:Script Text|type=supplemental51|speaker=
|text=}}
 
|comments=


{{FGC:Comment|name=
{{FGC:Comment|name=Alaska Slim
|comment=}}
|comment=Actually, the upright issue aside, I don't think any of that is a given. Not in the time frame the episode presents anyway. When it comes to the turrets the Iowa-class had clips which could have kept the turrets inside their rings. There are cases of older American battleships designs having done so [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJfGJPLDwAI&ab_channel=kaviski1#t=38m22 at Pearl Harbor].


{{FGC:Comment|name=
Now would they have fired? Most likely not. Even if they had, the velocity would have been so low I think we would have been waiting for the proximity fuses to go off.}}
|comment=}}


{{FGC:Comment|name=
{{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos
|comment=}}
|comment= Proximity(VT) fuses don't operate underwater and were never used with USN battleship main battery weapons. Maybe the Iowas in NGE use Russian-style [https://web.archive.org/web/20041025183045/http://world.guns.ru/assault/as69-e.htm supercavitating underwater ammo], Type 91 [https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/2016/07/01/japans-diving-shells-in-the-battle-of-cape-esperance/ diving shell style]? But the point about [https://www.quora.com/Why-do-the-turrets-on-battleships-always-come-off-when-they-sink/answer/Mike-Irwin-32 turret clips is an interesting one].}}


}}
}}

Latest revision as of 19:44, 9 July 2021


Screenshots Cut # Description/Dialogue Commentary

270

The two ships sinking downwards!!
The cable is in between them.

SPEAKER (FEMALE) (OFF):“The battleships are sinking towards the target.”

UrsusArctos: Battleships are not hydrodynamic underwater. Real-life battleships that sunk would disintegrate, turning over so that their gun turrets popped out, their superstructure came apart, and their bulkheads imploded from collapsing air pockets. But I can forgive Evangelion for not paying attention to any of that if the results are cool enough.


Alaska Slim: Actually, the upright issue aside, I don't think any of that is a given. Not in the time frame the episode presents anyway. When it comes to the turrets the Iowa-class had clips which could have kept the turrets inside their rings. There are cases of older American battleships designs having done so at Pearl Harbor.

Now would they have fired? Most likely not. Even if they had, the velocity would have been so low I think we would have been waiting for the proximity fuses to go off.


UrsusArctos: Proximity(VT) fuses don't operate underwater and were never used with USN battleship main battery weapons. Maybe the Iowas in NGE use Russian-style supercavitating underwater ammo, Type 91 diving shell style? But the point about turret clips is an interesting one.