FGC:Episode 07 Cut 222: Difference between revisions

From EvaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Thought it was better to leave my mistake in the clear - it's a YB-49, not an XB-49.)
No edit summary
 
Line 47: Line 47:


{{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos
{{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos
|comment=Interesting! You're right, and I was mistaken. There's no XB-49, the designation jumps straight to YB-49. I suppose the XB-35 was meant to be the prototype to the YB-49 pre-production aircraft? This is new to me.}}
|comment=Interesting! You're right, and I was mistaken. There's no XB-49, the designation jumps straight to YB-49. I suppose the XB-35 was meant to be the prototype to the YB-49 pre-production aircraft? This is new to me. EDIT: Confirmed, the real-world aircraft is a YB-49 (no "XB" involved), developed straight from the XB-35 and YB-35.}}


|collapsible_comments=
{{FGC:Comment|name=
|comment=}}
{{FGC:Comment|name=
|comment=}}


}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:58, 1 October 2021


Screenshots Cut # Description/Dialogue Commentary

222

Auxiliary take-off boosters igniting. Close-up of the rockets!

SE <<FWOOOOSH>>

UrsusArctos: For military nerds out there, the Eva transporter looks like a scaled-up Northrop XB-49, a jet-powered flying wing from the late 1940s/early 1950s. Rocket-assisted takeoff (RATO) was used during the turbojet era, but it fell out of service because modern turbofan engines generate their maximum thrust at sea level.


ath: Wait, wasn't Northrop's aircraft called YB-49? If I remember correctly, the 'Y' prefix designates a prototype of an aircraft intended for production, while the 'X' prefix is reserved for purely experimental aircraft. That said, the distinction can be a little fuzzy at times (compare YF-22/YF-23 to X-32/X-35, for example).

The Evangelion Encyclopedia seems to be confused on this point. It notes the resemblance to a real aircraft they call "XB-49"; but seems surprisingly sure that the official designation of this aircraft in the Evangelion universe is in fact "YB-49". Does any official source confirm this?


UrsusArctos: Interesting! You're right, and I was mistaken. There's no XB-49, the designation jumps straight to YB-49. I suppose the XB-35 was meant to be the prototype to the YB-49 pre-production aircraft? This is new to me. EDIT: Confirmed, the real-world aircraft is a YB-49 (no "XB" involved), developed straight from the XB-35 and YB-35.