Talk:Angels (Adam's Children)

Should this be merged back into the main Angel article? --Reichu 19:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Anyone? --Reichu 11:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, the main article looks way too stubby without this material. --thewayneiac 17:08 EDT. April 23, 2010

I have edited the Motivations and Psychology section for the recent translation change (see this thread). Are we treating CI as canon, so should the section be changed to just quote the CI as gospel? Also, I think there is messy overlap with the main Angel article (eg blood type). IMHO either the pages should a) be merged or b) "Angel" should just discuss whether Adam, Lilith, Kowaru and the Liln are angels and then the "Adam's Children" page goes into detail about Sachiel to Armisael --Nomis1242 14:00, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, this should most likely be merged back into the main Angel article. I must have been low on one of my meds when I split them in the first place... Regarding CI, the wiki treats it "like gospel" provided it doesn't contradict anything, although utilizing the ref tags to point out the source of this information -- for people who wander in and wonder "WTF?", and to cover our asses in general -- is a good idea. --Reichu 02:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)