Talk:Nerv Headquarters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I suggest that Central Dogma and Terminal Dogma be merged into this. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 23:40, 22 August 2007 (EDT) | I suggest that Central Dogma and Terminal Dogma be merged into this. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 23:40, 22 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
:I think they're significant enough as to merit their own pages. Meanwhile, why is it spelled "Headquarters" with a capital "H" now? (Not that I'm complaining, it looks nicer that way). --[[User:V|V]] 09:41, 23 August 2007 (EDT) | :I think they're significant enough as to merit their own pages. Meanwhile, why is it spelled "Headquarters" with a capital "H" now? (Not that I'm complaining, it looks nicer that way). --[[User:V|V]] 09:41, 23 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
::It's hard to write about Nerv HQ without mentioning Central Dogma, because a lot (most?) of the active Nerv HQ facility is IN Central Dogma. | |||
::Terminal Dogma has most of the more "esoteric" crap... but ultimately it's just another section of HQ. | |||
::It's "Headquarters" because this is a place. Hence, proper noun. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 10:16, 23 August 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:16, 23 August 2007
I suggest that Central Dogma and Terminal Dogma be merged into this. --Reichu 23:40, 22 August 2007 (EDT)
- I think they're significant enough as to merit their own pages. Meanwhile, why is it spelled "Headquarters" with a capital "H" now? (Not that I'm complaining, it looks nicer that way). --V 09:41, 23 August 2007 (EDT)
- It's hard to write about Nerv HQ without mentioning Central Dogma, because a lot (most?) of the active Nerv HQ facility is IN Central Dogma.
- Terminal Dogma has most of the more "esoteric" crap... but ultimately it's just another section of HQ.
- It's "Headquarters" because this is a place. Hence, proper noun. --Reichu 10:16, 23 August 2007 (EDT)
