Talk:2001: A Space Odyssey: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Eva Yojimbo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Again Dr. Nick, this should not exist as an article, unless it's mostly a comparison of similarities between the two works. Of course, on the front of here you did say that you did have in mind to put up pictures about each; so please get those up quickly ^_^ --[[User:V|V]] 11:17, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | Again Dr. Nick, this should not exist as an article, unless it's mostly a comparison of similarities between the two works. Of course, on the front of here you did say that you did have in mind to put up pictures about each; so please get those up quickly ^_^ --[[User:V|V]] 11:17, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Also, 2001 (the film) did NOT contain artificial evolution and alien progenitors. While Clarke's book did, Kubrick made it very clear that we were not to know exactly what the Monoliths were or did (if anything). The most obvious link I find between the two are with the monoliths. A screen shot of both should be easy to upload.--[[User:Eva Yojimbo|Eva Yojimbo]] 07:53, 18 August 2007 (EDT) | :Also, 2001 (the film) did NOT contain artificial evolution and alien progenitors. While Clarke's book did, Kubrick made it very clear that we were not to know exactly what the Monoliths were or did (if anything). The most obvious link I find between the two are with the monoliths. A screen shot of both should be easy to upload.--[[User:Eva Yojimbo|Eva Yojimbo]] 07:53, 18 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Actually, on other pages like this Dr.Nick has explained that they will be devoted to comparisons with NGE; I don't really see a big difference if the book or movie of 2001 mentioned it or not, when I think "2001" I think "Progenitor Aliens like the FAR doing stuff". --[[User:V|V]] 13:02, 19 August 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:02, 19 August 2007
Again Dr. Nick, this should not exist as an article, unless it's mostly a comparison of similarities between the two works. Of course, on the front of here you did say that you did have in mind to put up pictures about each; so please get those up quickly ^_^ --V 11:17, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- Also, 2001 (the film) did NOT contain artificial evolution and alien progenitors. While Clarke's book did, Kubrick made it very clear that we were not to know exactly what the Monoliths were or did (if anything). The most obvious link I find between the two are with the monoliths. A screen shot of both should be easy to upload.--Eva Yojimbo 07:53, 18 August 2007 (EDT)
- Actually, on other pages like this Dr.Nick has explained that they will be devoted to comparisons with NGE; I don't really see a big difference if the book or movie of 2001 mentioned it or not, when I think "2001" I think "Progenitor Aliens like the FAR doing stuff". --V 13:02, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
