Talk:Angels (Adam's Children): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The wayneiac (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Anyone? --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 11:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | :Anyone? --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 11:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, the main article looks way too stubby without this material. --[[User:The wayneiac|thewayneiac]] 17:08 EDT. April 23, 2010 | ::Yes, the main article looks way too stubby without this material. --[[User:The wayneiac|thewayneiac]] 17:08 EDT. April 23, 2010 | ||
I have edited the Motivations and Psychology section for the recent translation change (see [http://forum.evageeks.org/viewtopic.php?t=10302&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=20 this thread]). Are we treating CI as canon, so should the section be changed to just quote the CI as gospel? | |||
Also, I think there is messy overlap with the main Angel article (eg blood type). IMHO either the pages should | |||
a) be merged or | |||
b) "Angel" should just discuss whether Adam, Lilith, Kowaru and the Liln are angels and then the "Adam's Children" page goes into detail about Sachiel to Armisael --[[User:Nomis1242|Nomis1242]] 14:00, 25 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:00, 25 December 2010
Should this be merged back into the main Angel article? --Reichu 19:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone? --Reichu 11:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, the main article looks way too stubby without this material. --thewayneiac 17:08 EDT. April 23, 2010
I have edited the Motivations and Psychology section for the recent translation change (see this thread). Are we treating CI as canon, so should the section be changed to just quote the CI as gospel? Also, I think there is messy overlap with the main Angel article (eg blood type). IMHO either the pages should a) be merged or b) "Angel" should just discuss whether Adam, Lilith, Kowaru and the Liln are angels and then the "Adam's Children" page goes into detail about Sachiel to Armisael --Nomis1242 14:00, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
