Talk:Lilith: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Relationship Between Lilith and EVA-01== | |||
Re: "The Evangelion Units were created by making clones of Adam, with the exception of Evangelion Unit-01. <snip>" -- Even the translation of ''bunshin'' as "clone" is contentious. The most that can be mentioned here are neutral facts and observations (Lilith was used to create EVA-01, EVA-01 able to serve as a substitute for Lilith in 3I, etc.) and a statement that the exact nature of their relationship is a matter of contention. The details and various arguments/theories would be dealt with in the T&A pages (first-tier and second-tier). --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 08:00, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | Re: "The Evangelion Units were created by making clones of Adam, with the exception of Evangelion Unit-01. <snip>" -- Even the translation of ''bunshin'' as "clone" is contentious. The most that can be mentioned here are neutral facts and observations (Lilith was used to create EVA-01, EVA-01 able to serve as a substitute for Lilith in 3I, etc.) and a statement that the exact nature of their relationship is a matter of contention. The details and various arguments/theories would be dealt with in the T&A pages (first-tier and second-tier). --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 08:00, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Yes, I was confused about this myself; I was just throwing up material to try to get something up there. Should work in the uncertainty stuff. --[[User:V|V]] 11:39, 31 July 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:39, 31 July 2007
Relationship Between Lilith and EVA-01
Re: "The Evangelion Units were created by making clones of Adam, with the exception of Evangelion Unit-01. <snip>" -- Even the translation of bunshin as "clone" is contentious. The most that can be mentioned here are neutral facts and observations (Lilith was used to create EVA-01, EVA-01 able to serve as a substitute for Lilith in 3I, etc.) and a statement that the exact nature of their relationship is a matter of contention. The details and various arguments/theories would be dealt with in the T&A pages (first-tier and second-tier). --Reichu 08:00, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, I was confused about this myself; I was just throwing up material to try to get something up there. Should work in the uncertainty stuff. --V 11:39, 31 July 2007 (EDT)