Category talk:Maintenance templates: Difference between revisions
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Actually, I think I could make a more expansive "Cleanup2" and "Cleanup3". Deconstruction becomes cleanup2...simpler to remember. And spgerror becomes cleanup3. Cleanup2 is for articles that aren't a total mess but are larger than they need to be, and cleanup3 is for ones that have spelling and grammar erros and minor violations of convention. Firefox spell checker works for new entries but not for existing errors. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 06:18, 4 March 2008 (PST) | Actually, I think I could make a more expansive "Cleanup2" and "Cleanup3". Deconstruction becomes cleanup2...simpler to remember. And spgerror becomes cleanup3. Cleanup2 is for articles that aren't a total mess but are larger than they need to be, and cleanup3 is for ones that have spelling and grammar erros and minor violations of convention. Firefox spell checker works for new entries but not for existing errors. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 06:18, 4 March 2008 (PST) | ||
Ursus there only really needs to be one "Cleanup" template; you're spending time on making NEW "Cleanup" templates rather than actually cleaning up the articles. --[[User:V|V]] 15:03, 4 March 2008 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 23:03, 4 March 2008
Wiki Syntax
I'm rewriting these so they use Wiki syntax... and have a bluer border. Also including automatic article talk page and edit links to some. ObsessiveMathsFreak 22:02, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- No problem but I'm kind of fond of the ones I originally used, i.e. "I really can't describe an Eva any other way"--V 22:04, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- Mostly the only changes I intend to make are to use the platinum script version of any dialogue. But I think we should keep the Stranglove one, despite it being external in some sense. ObsessiveMathsFreak 22:16, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
Template Use
Let me know if you think any of the templates are superfluous, or if you have any issues with them. If anything seems excessive, I'll gladly remove it. Also, the spgerror template. Any issues with it?--UrsusArctos 21:19, 3 March 2008 (PST)
- Spelling errors can be fixed in a matter of minutes now that firefox incorporates a spellcheck function, thus correction for spelling isn't really much of an issue. --V 23:06, 3 March 2008 (PST)
- Point taken. I'll probably take it down tomorrow morning. --UrsusArctos 03:57, 4 March 2008 (PST)
Actually, I think I could make a more expansive "Cleanup2" and "Cleanup3". Deconstruction becomes cleanup2...simpler to remember. And spgerror becomes cleanup3. Cleanup2 is for articles that aren't a total mess but are larger than they need to be, and cleanup3 is for ones that have spelling and grammar erros and minor violations of convention. Firefox spell checker works for new entries but not for existing errors. --UrsusArctos 06:18, 4 March 2008 (PST)
Ursus there only really needs to be one "Cleanup" template; you're spending time on making NEW "Cleanup" templates rather than actually cleaning up the articles. --V 15:03, 4 March 2008 (PST)
