Talk:Second Impact: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::::You mean you even want the one gone from the "[[Evangelions]]" article? But quotes make things look shiny (so long as they're from ''within'' the show). --[[User:V|V]] 12:28, 24 December 2007 (PST) | :::::You mean you even want the one gone from the "[[Evangelions]]" article? But quotes make things look shiny (so long as they're from ''within'' the show). --[[User:V|V]] 12:28, 24 December 2007 (PST) | ||
::::Any which ones. "Shiny" is irrelevant. If it's important, it'll be in the article itself, not floating on top taking up space. Savvy? --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 12:34, 24 December 2007 (PST) | ::::Any which ones. "Shiny" is irrelevant. If it's important, it'll be in the article itself, not floating on top taking up space. Savvy? --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 12:34, 24 December 2007 (PST) | ||
:::::Don't make me start crying....don't....oh, too late......well are you sure? The Star Trek Wiki uses quotes for stuff like Klingons: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Klingon --[[User:V|V]] 14:18, 24 December 2007 (PST) | |||
==O BLAAARGAAAG???== | ==O BLAAARGAAAG???== | ||
Guoooo! Quotes again? By the way, the total death toll was three billion, so Adam was technically responsible, directly or indirectly, for getting rid of half of mankind and not a third. The quotation might be spiffy but it does not exactly seem correct in context- not to mention that it would peddle the idea that "Eva is religious propaganda" to a newcomer.--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 17:38, 23 December 2007 (PST) | Guoooo! Quotes again? By the way, the total death toll was three billion, so Adam was technically responsible, directly or indirectly, for getting rid of half of mankind and not a third. The quotation might be spiffy but it does not exactly seem correct in context- not to mention that it would peddle the idea that "Eva is religious propaganda" to a newcomer.--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 17:38, 23 December 2007 (PST) | ||
:"Eva is religious propaganda", well yeah; what did you think I was trying to do? :) Yes, but the bible quote using a "third" is misleading because it was really a half....hmm......--[[User:V|V]] 17:54, 23 December 2007 (PST) | :"Eva is religious propaganda", well yeah; what did you think I was trying to do? :) Yes, but the bible quote using a "third" is misleading because it was really a half....hmm......--[[User:V|V]] 17:54, 23 December 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 22:18, 24 December 2007
Eh? What the blazes is all this, V? What have you done to this page? --UrsusArctos 02:52, 20 December 2007 (PST)
- Quotes make things look spiffy. --V 09:33, 23 December 2007 (PST)
- This is an encyclopedia. They're unnecessary fluff. --Reichu 10:57, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- Quotes from the series then? Yeah I admit the biblical quote was kind of out there. --V 11:06, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- No. No quotes at all. Fluff, like I said. --Reichu 11:26, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- You mean you even want the one gone from the "Evangelions" article? But quotes make things look shiny (so long as they're from within the show). --V 12:28, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- Any which ones. "Shiny" is irrelevant. If it's important, it'll be in the article itself, not floating on top taking up space. Savvy? --Reichu 12:34, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- Don't make me start crying....don't....oh, too late......well are you sure? The Star Trek Wiki uses quotes for stuff like Klingons: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Klingon --V 14:18, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- No. No quotes at all. Fluff, like I said. --Reichu 11:26, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- Quotes from the series then? Yeah I admit the biblical quote was kind of out there. --V 11:06, 24 December 2007 (PST)
- This is an encyclopedia. They're unnecessary fluff. --Reichu 10:57, 24 December 2007 (PST)
O BLAAARGAAAG???
Guoooo! Quotes again? By the way, the total death toll was three billion, so Adam was technically responsible, directly or indirectly, for getting rid of half of mankind and not a third. The quotation might be spiffy but it does not exactly seem correct in context- not to mention that it would peddle the idea that "Eva is religious propaganda" to a newcomer.--UrsusArctos 17:38, 23 December 2007 (PST)
- "Eva is religious propaganda", well yeah; what did you think I was trying to do? :) Yes, but the bible quote using a "third" is misleading because it was really a half....hmm......--V 17:54, 23 December 2007 (PST)
