Talk:Second Impact: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Eh? What the blazes is all this, V? What have you done to this page? --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 02:52, 20 December 2007 (PST) | Eh? What the blazes is all this, V? What have you done to this page? --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 02:52, 20 December 2007 (PST) | ||
:Quotes make things look spiffy. --[[User:V|V]] 09:33, 23 December 2007 (PST) | :Quotes make things look spiffy. --[[User:V|V]] 09:33, 23 December 2007 (PST) | ||
==O BLAAARGAAAG???== | |||
Guoooo! Quotes again? By the way, the total death toll was three billion, so Adam was technically responsible, directly or indirectly, for getting rid of half of mankind and not a third. The quotation might be spiffy but it does not exactly seem correct in context- not to mention that it would peddle the idea that "Eva is religious propaganda" to a newcomer.--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 17:38, 23 December 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 01:38, 24 December 2007
Eh? What the blazes is all this, V? What have you done to this page? --UrsusArctos 02:52, 20 December 2007 (PST)
- Quotes make things look spiffy. --V 09:33, 23 December 2007 (PST)
O BLAAARGAAAG???
Guoooo! Quotes again? By the way, the total death toll was three billion, so Adam was technically responsible, directly or indirectly, for getting rid of half of mankind and not a third. The quotation might be spiffy but it does not exactly seem correct in context- not to mention that it would peddle the idea that "Eva is religious propaganda" to a newcomer.--UrsusArctos 17:38, 23 December 2007 (PST)
