Theory and Analysis Talk:Kaworu in Eva 3.0: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RussianRiz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
RussianRiz (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Due to the fact that this page is too old and too dated, I will consider with Blockio that we could actually delete it. In my opinion, there are several problems in this page with its struture and purpose (regardless of Kaworu's agenda, why did we create a page for him, since, as we saw in the film, everyone had their reasons for acting in a specific and weird way towards the events previously portrayed?; despite the fact the article is intended to discuss Shinji Ikari's attitude, it never reaches its objetive; the page is full of "higly possible", "seems" and other levels of speculations that are, in fact, dead ends etc). It's a remembrance of several interpretations of a scene that gained new contexts and meanings over time. These days, with the film series completed, people would have little reason to return here. | :Due to the fact that this page is too old and too dated, I will consider with Blockio that we could actually delete it. In my opinion, there are several problems in this page with its struture and purpose (regardless of Kaworu's agenda, why did we create a page for him, since, as we saw in the film, everyone had their reasons for acting in a specific and weird way towards the events previously portrayed?; despite the fact the article is intended to discuss Shinji Ikari's attitude, it never reaches its objetive; the page is full of "higly possible", "seems" and other levels of speculations that are, in fact, dead ends etc). It's a remembrance of several interpretations of a scene that gained new contexts and meanings over time. These days, with the film series completed, people would have little reason to return here. | ||
Also, the existence of a thread focused on discussing the sequence itself is much of sufficient, if you ask me. As you said, much of this page and its structure are out of place for a wiki page. --[[User:RussianRiz|RussianRiz]] ([[User talk:RussianRiz|talk]]) 21:31, 26 June 2023 (BRT) | :Also, the existence of a thread focused on discussing the sequence itself is much of sufficient, if you ask me. As you said, much of this page and its structure are out of place for a wiki page. --[[User:RussianRiz|RussianRiz]] ([[User talk:RussianRiz|talk]]) 21:31, 26 June 2023 (BRT) |
Revision as of 00:37, 27 June 2023
Page marked saying it needs edits to make it less biased/more neutral. Does this include things like the use of the word "I" on the page by the author? Example:
"Firstly, there is something I always thought odd during the fight between Asuka and Shinji"
Or is this more referring to authors inserting their own, less neutral conclusions in pages?
I'm also curious if there was ever a plan to remove the profanity from this page. Example:
"Lastly, you must all have noticed how SEELE didn't really give a shit that Gendo betrayed them and turned them off"
Seems out of place for a wiki page.
- FanofEvaGeeks
- Due to the fact that this page is too old and too dated, I will consider with Blockio that we could actually delete it. In my opinion, there are several problems in this page with its struture and purpose (regardless of Kaworu's agenda, why did we create a page for him, since, as we saw in the film, everyone had their reasons for acting in a specific and weird way towards the events previously portrayed?; despite the fact the article is intended to discuss Shinji Ikari's attitude, it never reaches its objetive; the page is full of "higly possible", "seems" and other levels of speculations that are, in fact, dead ends etc). It's a remembrance of several interpretations of a scene that gained new contexts and meanings over time. These days, with the film series completed, people would have little reason to return here.
- Also, the existence of a thread focused on discussing the sequence itself is much of sufficient, if you ask me. As you said, much of this page and its structure are out of place for a wiki page. --RussianRiz (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2023 (BRT)