Talk:Adam: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Someone should probably look into the exact deal with these things, since I keep on forgetting and it would be important when discussing the post-2I stuff. Do they even actually'' use'' the embryo for stuff? I mean, there wasn't anything stopping them from starting Evas BEFORE they'd be faced with the inconvenience of Adam blowing sky-high and hoping there would be something left for them to fish out of the Antarctic waters somehow or other. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 05:01, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | Someone should probably look into the exact deal with these things, since I keep on forgetting and it would be important when discussing the post-2I stuff. Do they even actually'' use'' the embryo for stuff? I mean, there wasn't anything stopping them from starting Evas BEFORE they'd be faced with the inconvenience of Adam blowing sky-high and hoping there would be something left for them to fish out of the Antarctic waters somehow or other. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 05:01, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
:...um, I get the impression that the genetic samples they took were from the actual embryo of Adam. Technically, yeah I guess they could have used cell samples and stuff, but they had the actual embryo itself....you do make the point that we're not sure if the embryo was itself needed to be, you know, ''alive'' as it was for cell samples. I mean it probably was what they used. I'll touch upon this later. --[[User:V|V]] 11:25, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | :...um, I get the impression that the genetic samples they took were from the actual embryo of Adam. Technically, yeah I guess they could have used cell samples and stuff, but they had the actual embryo itself....you do make the point that we're not sure if the embryo was itself needed to be, you know, ''alive'' as it was for cell samples. I mean it probably was what they used. I'll touch upon this later. --[[User:V|V]] 11:25, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Well, now that I think about it, Ritsuko does seem to imply a sort of chronology when she babbles in #23. Though it doesn't make any particular sense why they wouldn't have just taken samples BEFORE Adam went kablooey. (lol NGE) But, yeah, some stuff on that Adam Project / Project E mess = Win. Though I don't think you in particular need to spend time doing the research on that; you're a busy guy. --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 12:23, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:23, 31 July 2007
"Defeated by..."
We don't need this field for Seeds. Neither Adam nor Lilith were really "defeated" by anybody. --Reichu 05:04, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- I guess you're right on that; I'll have to tinker around to do that thing to "hide" a field not used...--V 11:23, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Project E / Adam Project
Someone should probably look into the exact deal with these things, since I keep on forgetting and it would be important when discussing the post-2I stuff. Do they even actually use the embryo for stuff? I mean, there wasn't anything stopping them from starting Evas BEFORE they'd be faced with the inconvenience of Adam blowing sky-high and hoping there would be something left for them to fish out of the Antarctic waters somehow or other. --Reichu 05:01, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- ...um, I get the impression that the genetic samples they took were from the actual embryo of Adam. Technically, yeah I guess they could have used cell samples and stuff, but they had the actual embryo itself....you do make the point that we're not sure if the embryo was itself needed to be, you know, alive as it was for cell samples. I mean it probably was what they used. I'll touch upon this later. --V 11:25, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- Well, now that I think about it, Ritsuko does seem to imply a sort of chronology when she babbles in #23. Though it doesn't make any particular sense why they wouldn't have just taken samples BEFORE Adam went kablooey. (lol NGE) But, yeah, some stuff on that Adam Project / Project E mess = Win. Though I don't think you in particular need to spend time doing the research on that; you're a busy guy. --Reichu 12:23, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
