Category talk:Maintenance templates: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Let me know if you think any of the templates are superfluous, or if you have any issues with them. If anything seems excessive, I'll gladly remove it. Also, the spgerror template. Any issues with it?--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 21:19, 3 March 2008 (PST) | Let me know if you think any of the templates are superfluous, or if you have any issues with them. If anything seems excessive, I'll gladly remove it. Also, the spgerror template. Any issues with it?--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 21:19, 3 March 2008 (PST) | ||
:Spelling errors can be fixed in a matter of minutes now that firefox incorporates a spellcheck function, thus correction for spelling isn't really much of an issue. --[[User:V|V]] 23:06, 3 March 2008 (PST) | :Spelling errors can be fixed in a matter of minutes now that firefox incorporates a spellcheck function, thus correction for spelling isn't really much of an issue. --[[User:V|V]] 23:06, 3 March 2008 (PST) | ||
::Point taken. I'll probably take it down tomorrow morning. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 03:57, 4 March 2008 (PST) |
Revision as of 11:57, 4 March 2008
Wiki Syntax
I'm rewriting these so they use Wiki syntax... and have a bluer border. Also including automatic article talk page and edit links to some. ObsessiveMathsFreak 22:02, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- No problem but I'm kind of fond of the ones I originally used, i.e. "I really can't describe an Eva any other way"--V 22:04, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
- Mostly the only changes I intend to make are to use the platinum script version of any dialogue. But I think we should keep the Stranglove one, despite it being external in some sense. ObsessiveMathsFreak 22:16, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
Template Use
Let me know if you think any of the templates are superfluous, or if you have any issues with them. If anything seems excessive, I'll gladly remove it. Also, the spgerror template. Any issues with it?--UrsusArctos 21:19, 3 March 2008 (PST)
- Spelling errors can be fixed in a matter of minutes now that firefox incorporates a spellcheck function, thus correction for spelling isn't really much of an issue. --V 23:06, 3 March 2008 (PST)
- Point taken. I'll probably take it down tomorrow morning. --UrsusArctos 03:57, 4 March 2008 (PST)