Talk:Meta:Image Guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ornette this is incorrect: images should be under 150 KB, not under 30KB. In fact, images under 30 KB are pretty much unusable for ''Evapedia'' stuff, they're too blurry. Or is this meant for the EvaCommentary pages, which are supposed to have smaller images because there are more of them? --[[User:V|V]] 10:12, 16 February 2008 (PST) | Ornette this is incorrect: images should be under 150 KB, not under 30KB. In fact, images under 30 KB are pretty much unusable for ''Evapedia'' stuff, they're too blurry. Or is this meant for the EvaCommentary pages, which are supposed to have smaller images because there are more of them? --[[User:V|V]] 10:12, 16 February 2008 (PST) | ||
:It wasn't Ornette who wrote that, it was OMF's work, and it was meant to be a first draft. Most of the images on this site blatantly violate the guidelines anyway. Some serious changing is needed here. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 16:57, 16 February 2008 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 00:57, 17 February 2008
Ornette this is incorrect: images should be under 150 KB, not under 30KB. In fact, images under 30 KB are pretty much unusable for Evapedia stuff, they're too blurry. Or is this meant for the EvaCommentary pages, which are supposed to have smaller images because there are more of them? --V 10:12, 16 February 2008 (PST)
- It wasn't Ornette who wrote that, it was OMF's work, and it was meant to be a first draft. Most of the images on this site blatantly violate the guidelines anyway. Some serious changing is needed here. --UrsusArctos 16:57, 16 February 2008 (PST)
