FGC:Episode 07 Cut 222: Difference between revisions
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) (Thought it was better to leave my mistake in the clear - it's a YB-49, not an XB-49.) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
{{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos | {{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos | ||
|comment=For military nerds out there, the Eva transporter looks like a scaled-up Northrop XB-49, a jet-powered flying wing from the late 1940s/early 1950s. Rocket-assisted takeoff (RATO) was used during the turbojet era, but it fell out of service because modern turbofan engines generate their maximum thrust at sea level.}} | |comment=For military nerds out there, the Eva transporter looks like a scaled-up Northrop XB-49, a jet-powered flying wing from the late 1940s/early 1950s. Rocket-assisted takeoff (RATO) was used during the turbojet era, but it fell out of service because modern turbofan engines generate their maximum thrust at sea level.}} | ||
{{FGC:Comment|name=ath | {{FGC:Comment|name=ath | ||
Line 56: | Line 48: | ||
{{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos | {{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos | ||
|comment=Interesting! You're right, and I was mistaken. There's no XB-49, the designation jumps straight to YB-49. I suppose the XB-35 was meant to be the prototype to the YB-49 pre-production aircraft? This is new to me.}} | |comment=Interesting! You're right, and I was mistaken. There's no XB-49, the designation jumps straight to YB-49. I suppose the XB-35 was meant to be the prototype to the YB-49 pre-production aircraft? This is new to me.}} | ||
|collapsible_comments= | |||
{{FGC:Comment|name= | |||
|comment=}} | |||
{{FGC:Comment|name= | |||
|comment=}} | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 23:53, 1 October 2021
Screenshots | Cut # | Description/Dialogue | Commentary | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
222 |
|
|