Talk:Angel-Sealing Hex Glyphs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Angel-sealing hex pillar to Talk:Angel-sealing Hex Pillars: Capitalizing, plus I guess it makes more sense for page title to be in the plural.) |
m (Reichu moved page Talk:Angel-sealing Hex Pillars to Talk:Angel-Sealing Hex Glyphs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Absent any other reason, I strongly encourage it be 'Angel-sealing'. After all, it's not currently 'Angel-Sealing Hex Pillar'. --[[User talk:Gwern |Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern | (contribs)]] 06:23 17 February 2011 (GMT) | :Absent any other reason, I strongly encourage it be 'Angel-sealing'. After all, it's not currently 'Angel-Sealing Hex Pillar'. --[[User talk:Gwern |Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern | (contribs)]] 06:23 17 February 2011 (GMT) | ||
:"Angel-Sealing" looks better and provides an acronym of sorts (ASHP), although I'd hardly put it as a serious reason for change. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 01:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:11, 30 April 2013
Page Title
So in accordance with the concept that page titles should be capitalized, would it be "Angel-sealing" or "Angel-Sealing"? --Reichu 03:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Absent any other reason, I strongly encourage it be 'Angel-sealing'. After all, it's not currently 'Angel-Sealing Hex Pillar'. --Gwern (contribs) 06:23 17 February 2011 (GMT)
- "Angel-Sealing" looks better and provides an acronym of sorts (ASHP), although I'd hardly put it as a serious reason for change. --UrsusArctos 01:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
