Category talk:Evangelion Characters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
The wayneiac (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding the reorganization currently underway, I think it might be better to use subheadings under "Profile" rather than keep everything at the same level. E.g.: | |||
<nowiki>==Profile==</nowiki><br> | |||
<nowiki>===Relationship with Penpen===</nowiki><br> | |||
<nowiki>===Legacy as a Shrimper===</nowiki><br> | |||
<nowiki>==In the Musical==</nowiki> | |||
How does that sound? --[[User:Reichu|Reichu]] 15:48, 19 April 2009 (PDT) | |||
A-ok [[User:The wayneiac|thewayneiac]] 18:58 EDT. April 19, 2009 | |||
==Stubs?== | |||
Why are so many of the character articles still stubs? Some of the characters really don't have that info to go on them, so why should their articles remain marked as stubs? --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 23:47, 17 February 2008 (PST) | Why are so many of the character articles still stubs? Some of the characters really don't have that info to go on them, so why should their articles remain marked as stubs? --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 23:47, 17 February 2008 (PST) | ||
:Reichu told me to stop contributing active information for a time so other people would get a chance to do it. --[[User:V|V]] 06:05, 18 February 2008 (PST) | :Reichu told me to stop contributing active information for a time so other people would get a chance to do it. --[[User:V|V]] 06:05, 18 February 2008 (PST) | ||
::Urk. That isn't what I asked.--[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 18:16, 18 February 2008 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:59, 19 April 2009
Regarding the reorganization currently underway, I think it might be better to use subheadings under "Profile" rather than keep everything at the same level. E.g.:
==Profile==
===Relationship with Penpen===
===Legacy as a Shrimper===
==In the Musical==
How does that sound? --Reichu 15:48, 19 April 2009 (PDT)
A-ok thewayneiac 18:58 EDT. April 19, 2009
Stubs?
Why are so many of the character articles still stubs? Some of the characters really don't have that info to go on them, so why should their articles remain marked as stubs? --UrsusArctos 23:47, 17 February 2008 (PST)
- Reichu told me to stop contributing active information for a time so other people would get a chance to do it. --V 06:05, 18 February 2008 (PST)
- Urk. That isn't what I asked.--UrsusArctos 18:16, 18 February 2008 (PST)
