Resources Talk:Evangelion Biological Listing

If they're female, why do they officially have a prostate gland? --V 07:50, 30 December 2007 (PST)

I didn't see Ovaries in there, and nothing in it shows the core. Doublethink?

Wow, Eva-00 does have two eyes! Fufufu. --UrsusArctos 08:04, 30 December 2007 (PST)

Er, I think they were just reusing the readout animation from other Evas and such. --V 08:07, 30 December 2007 (PST)

The listing I never took COMPLETELY seriously, since it seems to scream "dodgy production values", but...

V, the readout was only ever provided for Eva-00. --Reichu 09:43, 30 December 2007 (PST)

Well keep in mind that these same animators also inserted information about real-life animation studios into the printout for the "Classified UN report on Adam" --V 10:22, 30 December 2007 (PST)

Spaces

To make the listing show up right, I need a way to insert fixed widths to replace the underscores. Certain parts of the list become a mess without the proper spacing. --Reichu 09:53, 30 December 2007 (PST)

Not the thing you do with a colon, V; isn't there a way to tell Wiki you "want" spaces (i.e., the result of pressing the space bar)?

Is the blank space at the top of some of the columns on purpose? --thewayneiac 20:12 EDT. March 13, 2009

The blank spaces look like an artifact of the software itself. All the columns in the table are not of equal heights, and the way it sorts them out results in blank spaces being left at the top and bottom of shorter columns. --UrsusArctos 04:37, 15 March 2009 (PDT)

Wayne wrote in the history, "Is this a little more readable?" The current formatting for the tables actually looks more confusing to me -- it's not immediately clear how the list is meant to be read. Before, at least, it was arranged into simple columns, much like the original list. --Reichu 16:58, 20 March 2009 (PDT)

O.K., I took out the ruler lines, is that a litle better? (But what I actually need to do is figure out how to put in the vertical lines but not the horizontal lines.) --thewayneiac 21:57 EDT. March 21, 2009

To be honest, I think the page looked a lot better before. Is the only "problem" that the columns were centered vertically? --Reichu 11:50, 22 March 2009 (PDT)

Yeah, for some reason I found it rather annoying. --User:The Wayneiac:thewayneiac 17:29 EDT. March 22, 2009

I think I'm going to revert it and try tinkering a little. The page's appearance has suffered a lot just for the sake of having all of the text line up at top. --Reichu 15:03, 22 March 2009 (PDT)

O.K., it looks great now; that's just the look I was aiming for. --thewayneiac 18:50 EDT. March 22, 2009