Talk:Dirac Sea: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
For disambiguity, we could write "into the Angel Leliel's inverted AT Field" instead. Perhaps a slight detailing on the actual physics would be useful here. --AyrYntake 09:02 16 September 2008 (PST) | For disambiguity, we could write "into the Angel Leliel's inverted AT Field" instead. Perhaps a slight detailing on the actual physics would be useful here. --AyrYntake 09:02 16 September 2008 (PST) | ||
: Mentioning the basics of what a "Dirac Sea" is would suffice, since we already have the wikipedia link. And "shadow" is in double quotes to signify that it's not a shadow it all, but just what it looks like. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 06:39, 16 September 2008 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:39, 16 September 2008
"In Episode 16, Shinji is pulled down into the "shadow" of the Angel Leliel."
If I'm to trust the series, isn't the ball-in-the-sky object the actual shadow while the black circle on the ground the Angel itself? Would it be more concise, not to mention accurate, to say that Shinji is pulled down into the Angel?
For disambiguity, we could write "into the Angel Leliel's inverted AT Field" instead. Perhaps a slight detailing on the actual physics would be useful here. --AyrYntake 09:02 16 September 2008 (PST)
- Mentioning the basics of what a "Dirac Sea" is would suffice, since we already have the wikipedia link. And "shadow" is in double quotes to signify that it's not a shadow it all, but just what it looks like. --UrsusArctos 06:39, 16 September 2008 (PDT)