Theory and Analysis Talk:Kaworu in Eva 3.0

Page marked saying it needs edits to make it less biased/more neutral. Does this include things like the use of the word "I" on the page by the author? Example:

"Firstly, there is something I always thought odd during the fight between Asuka and Shinji"

Or is this more referring to authors inserting their own, less neutral conclusions in pages?

I'm also curious if there was ever a plan to remove the profanity from this page. Example:

"Lastly, you must all have noticed how SEELE didn't really give a shit that Gendo betrayed them and turned them off"

Seems out of place for a wiki page.

Yammm (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Due to the fact that this page is too old and too dated, I will consider with Blockio that we could actually delete it. In my opinion, there are several problems in this page with its struture and purpose (regardless of Kaworu's agenda, why did we create a page for him, since, as we saw in the film, everyone had their reasons for acting in a specific and weird way towards the events previously portrayed?; despite the fact the article is intended to discuss Shinji Ikari's attitude, it never reaches its objetive; the page is full of "higly possible", "seems" and other levels of speculations that are, in fact, dead ends etc). It's a remembrance of several interpretations of a scene that gained new contexts and meanings over time. These days, with the film series completed, people would have little reason to return here.

Also, the existence of a thread focused on discussing the sequence itself is much of sufficient, if you ask me. As you said, much of this page and its structure are out of place for a wiki page. --RussianRiz (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2023 (BRT)

Good points. I personally did find the page somewhat helpful on my first viewing of the NTE, as it covers some of the Near Third Impact vs the actual Third Impact, a topic which I was hoping to get some information on at the time. But to your point, it is far gone from the quality and structure of most wiki pages here and it is available on the forums, though harder to find without this page linking to it.

Yammm (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

The page in its current state is more up to the standards of our Wiki and is harmless in face to the problems it had before. The arguments presented in it now arise in a less passionate and informal and more rigorous way, considering that the existence of the article itself could still be of some use to the fandom today. Thank you for your collaboration with the aforementioned topics, we leave the space here free for your possible collaborations for the left content. --RussianRiz (talk) 13:58, 27 June 2023 (BRT)

Great edits/reworking! It looks so much nicer with your changes. Yammm (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)