User talk:Katayoku no Tenshi
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
HAY KNT R U EVAR GONNA RITE STUF 4 US LOL
Sorry, just being a pain in the ass. --Reichu 20:47, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
I am happy to see you contributing, nonetheless Reichu directly ordered me to put work on all English VA articles on hold until the more important articles are finished. We won't be getting to those until weeks if not months from now. Thus I cannot draw up guidelines for how to do them, etc. and I'd really rather you focused on something else for the time being. Thanks. --V 16:52, 14 December 2007 (PST)
- I see... I only did that because I have no fuggin clue when it come to the rest of the articles. *sigh*. I don't know if your watching this page V but how neutral should we be? Most of the articles that I've read... aren't.--Katayoku no Tenshi 17:11, 14 December 2007 (PST)
- Which articles are you talking about? You did an okay job but it does not match up with my excruciatingly high standards of neutrality. Ignore that for now. What articles "that I've read..."??--V 17:19, 14 December 2007 (PST)
- The Geektionary section on the Commentary of Evil: "While the track has some comedic merit, it is good for little else, packed head-to-toe with misinformation and shameless endorsement of the movies' dub (which even NGE dubbies tend to agree is a disappointment!) and the oftentimes horrifying decisions she made producing it (including this one). Jaffe gets a break because he at least attempted to present some worthwhile material, even if he wasn't 100% on track either (“Samhel”?). For something meant to accompany a very complicated and serious work of art, their commentary is offensively inadequate. Adding insult to injury, of course, is the fact that many of the poor n00bs who listen to it will, not knowing any better, parrot the commentary's BS until set straight by more wisened geeks. "
- Which articles are you talking about? You did an okay job but it does not match up with my excruciatingly high standards of neutrality. Ignore that for now. What articles "that I've read..."??--V 17:19, 14 December 2007 (PST)
- I can't think of anything else off the top of my head. --Katayoku no Tenshi 18:02, 14 December 2007 (PST)
- The Geektionary is part of the ported-over Greater "Fan Geeks Project", it's not part of the Evapedia. It's a separate part of the site, not my department. --V 18:12, 14 December 2007 (PST)
- I see... well that's all there is to say about that then. --Katayoku no Tenshi 18:23, 14 December 2007 (PST)
- The Geektionary is part of the ported-over Greater "Fan Geeks Project", it's not part of the Evapedia. It's a separate part of the site, not my department. --V 18:12, 14 December 2007 (PST)
