Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sachiel"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Are Sachiel's three fingers equi-distant from each other - each at 120 degree angles from the others - or are two in front close to each other and one behind the others (like the rear toe of a chicken). I've been going over the shot where it pics up Eva 01 by the head and it increasingly looks like they are equi-distant, it's just that one happens to be behind the others when you look at it head-on. --[[User:V|V]] 23:31, 29 August 2007 (EDT) | Are Sachiel's three fingers equi-distant from each other - each at 120 degree angles from the others - or are two in front close to each other and one behind the others (like the rear toe of a chicken). I've been going over the shot where it pics up Eva 01 by the head and it increasingly looks like they are equi-distant, it's just that one happens to be behind the others when you look at it head-on. --[[User:V|V]] 23:31, 29 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I checked, they're not equi-distant. At least, it ''could'' hold them that way, but much of the time two "fingers" are held close together in front. --[[User:V|V]] 23:40, 29 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:40, 30 August 2007
Are Sachiel's three fingers equi-distant from each other - each at 120 degree angles from the others - or are two in front close to each other and one behind the others (like the rear toe of a chicken). I've been going over the shot where it pics up Eva 01 by the head and it increasingly looks like they are equi-distant, it's just that one happens to be behind the others when you look at it head-on. --V 23:31, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
- I checked, they're not equi-distant. At least, it could hold them that way, but much of the time two "fingers" are held close together in front. --V 23:40, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
