Talk:Evangelion: 2.0 You Can (Not) Advance

Ursus, regarding the cuts I ascribed to "probably on a ship" which you changed to "probably in Tokyo-3", see here. All three seem to belong to the same scene, Shinji is hanging onto a railing, and beyond that railing is ocean. The "buildings" also look rather weird even by Tokyo-3 standards. Plus the "vast expanse of sky" plus "breeze" combination. Rollback, bitte? --Reichu 12:30, 28 March 2009 (PDT)

Done. --UrsusArctos 20:25, 28 March 2009 (PDT)

Well, is it time we got around to changing this article to reflect the grand troll job? --UrsusArctos 20:02, 27 June 2009 (PDT)

Plot Summary

That summary was cut and pasted from Soth's blog, with permission, in order to get this article started.Cyber XIII 18:38, 12 July 2009 (PDT)

Thanks. We probably have to credit Soth somewhere, just so people know. I'll get to reformatting the text to fit with the wiki conventions later. --UrsusArctos 18:18, 12 July 2009 (PDT)

You're welcome. Yeah, we should credit him. Should we remove the trailer bits?Cyber XIII 18:38, 12 July 2009 (PDT)

I guess so. There's no great purpose in keeping them any longer. Add a link to Soth's blog to the "External Links" section, I'll handle the appropriate accreditation.--UrsusArctos 08:31, 13 July 2009 (PDT)

Going through the review I notice that Soth and Ornette digress on a few points (Accents, etc.) It also looks like cleaning up Soth's review won't be as easy as it looked at first glance. I'd like a couple of other opinions before proceeding on this page. --UrsusArctos 08:36, 13 July 2009 (PDT)

How much of the trailers do I need to remove? (-- Preceding unsigned comment by Cyber XIII)

Write a small summary for each of the trailers, and then delete the scene-by-scene description.--UrsusArctos 18:01, 14 July 2009 (PDT)

Well, the 2.0 summary is in progress right now. My apologies to Soth, but it would be less of a hassle to write a new summary than to edit his review. I'll deal with other issues on this page soon enough. --UrsusArctos 05:53, 20 July 2009 (PDT)

Regarding the current summary (I remember writing it up and some other folks tweaking it accordingly), I know it has the "too detailed" tag, but I'm honestly stumped on what should be axed and what should stay; since mostly everything mentioned is important in some manner... (There's such a huge difference between a movie and an episode of a series.) Thoughts, please? --Sailor Star Dust 00:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Trailer Summaries

Should the trailers for 2.0 get their own page, be nuked from orbit, or just be one-paragraph/sentence summaries for each trailer? Not really sure what to do with those, but they obviously need work. --Sailor Star Dust 01:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Maybe just briefly summarizing the highlights of each ("fans got their first glimpse of....") would suffice. I mean, it doesn't hurt to have their release dates and a really quick bit of info here for posterity's sake, but obviously 99% of that crap can go. :3 --Reichu 01:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Okay, done. ^_^ (Hope it looks good according to what you'd like to see.) Now, I'm gradually working on fixing the 2.22 film summary accordingly... >_> --Sailor Star Dust 15:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

SSD wrote in History: "Was working on the trailer summaries but somebody else started working on them. Argh argh argh." I was actually just revising other shit on the page -- probably a bad idea, considering you were studiously at work! When that happens, you know how to integrate your changes with the "ninja edits", right? --Reichu 17:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Not really sure, but I'm assuming it involves some sort of copy/pasting. --Sailor Star Dust 18:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it does. ^_^; Basically, bring up the ninja-edits (should automatically appear when you try to save yours), and copy/paste them into your updated version (or vice versa, depending on what's easier). I hope you didn't lose any work. :((( --Reichu 18:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't believe I did, I was a little worried maybe you lost some of yours. ^^; But thanks a lot! --Sailor Star Dust 18:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)