Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evangelion: 2.0 You Can (Not) Advance"
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) |
(Question about trailers section.) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:Well, the 2.0 summary is in progress right now. My apologies to Soth, but it would be less of a hassle to write a new summary than to edit his review. I'll deal with other issues on this page soon enough. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 05:53, 20 July 2009 (PDT) | :Well, the 2.0 summary is in progress right now. My apologies to Soth, but it would be less of a hassle to write a new summary than to edit his review. I'll deal with other issues on this page soon enough. --[[User:UrsusArctos|UrsusArctos]] 05:53, 20 July 2009 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Trailer Summaries== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should the trailers for 2.0 get their own page, be nuked from orbit, or just be one-paragraph/sentence summaries for each trailer? Not really sure what to do with those, but they obviously need work. --[[User:Sailor Star Dust|Sailor Star Dust]] 01:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:46, 15 February 2011
Ursus, regarding the cuts I ascribed to "probably on a ship" which you changed to "probably in Tokyo-3", see here. All three seem to belong to the same scene, Shinji is hanging onto a railing, and beyond that railing is ocean. The "buildings" also look rather weird even by Tokyo-3 standards. Plus the "vast expanse of sky" plus "breeze" combination. Rollback, bitte? --Reichu 12:30, 28 March 2009 (PDT)
- Done. --UrsusArctos 20:25, 28 March 2009 (PDT)
Well, is it time we got around to changing this article to reflect the grand troll job? --UrsusArctos 20:02, 27 June 2009 (PDT)
Plot Summary
That summary was cut and pasted from Soth's blog, with permission, in order to get this article started.Cyber XIII 18:38, 12 July 2009 (PDT)
- Thanks. We probably have to credit Soth somewhere, just so people know. I'll get to reformatting the text to fit with the wiki conventions later. --UrsusArctos 18:18, 12 July 2009 (PDT)
You're welcome. Yeah, we should credit him. Should we remove the trailer bits?Cyber XIII 18:38, 12 July 2009 (PDT)
- I guess so. There's no great purpose in keeping them any longer. Add a link to Soth's blog to the "External Links" section, I'll handle the appropriate accreditation.--UrsusArctos 08:31, 13 July 2009 (PDT)
- Going through the review I notice that Soth and Ornette digress on a few points (Accents, etc.) It also looks like cleaning up Soth's review won't be as easy as it looked at first glance. I'd like a couple of other opinions before proceeding on this page. --UrsusArctos 08:36, 13 July 2009 (PDT)
- How much of the trailers do I need to remove? (-- Preceding unsigned comment by Cyber XIII)
- Write a small summary for each of the trailers, and then delete the scene-by-scene description.--UrsusArctos 18:01, 14 July 2009 (PDT)
- Well, the 2.0 summary is in progress right now. My apologies to Soth, but it would be less of a hassle to write a new summary than to edit his review. I'll deal with other issues on this page soon enough. --UrsusArctos 05:53, 20 July 2009 (PDT)
Trailer Summaries
Should the trailers for 2.0 get their own page, be nuked from orbit, or just be one-paragraph/sentence summaries for each trailer? Not really sure what to do with those, but they obviously need work. --Sailor Star Dust 01:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
