FGC:Episode 11 Cut 029: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Ornette's bot uploaded this) |
UrsusArctos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|cutname=029 | |cutname=029 | ||
|images= | |images= | ||
[[Image:11_029a.jpg]]<br><br> | |||
[[Image:11_029b.jpg]]<br><br> | |||
[[Image:11_029c.jpg]]<br><br> | |||
[[Image:11_029d.jpg]] | |||
|cutnumbertext=[[FGC:Episode 11 Cut 029|029]] | |cutnumbertext=[[FGC:Episode 11 Cut 029|029]] | ||
Line 34: | Line 38: | ||
|comments= | |comments= | ||
{{FGC:Comment|name= | {{FGC:Comment|name=dzzthink | ||
|comment=}} | |comment=0.008 off the theoretical value seems like a scientifically acceptable margin of error.}} | ||
{{FGC:Comment|name= | {{FGC:Comment|name=UrsusArctos | ||
|comment=}} | |comment=No. It's an absolute value, and like the operator says in the next cut, it's barely within their tolerance limit. Even if 0.008 was a fraction, there are several processes where a deviance of 8 in a 1000 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma would be wholly unacceptable]. }} | ||
{{FGC:Comment|name= | {{FGC:Comment|name= |
Latest revision as of 02:54, 23 January 2022
Screenshots | Cut # | Description/Dialogue | Commentary | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
029 |
|
|